Behavioral advertising, the anonymous or pseudonymous tracking of online activities for purposes of providing more targeted advertising and content, promises great potential for advertisers and publishers to build more relevant and trusting experiences for their users. But if you are thinking about using social or behavioral advertising because traditional display and email are yielding deplorably low response rates - don’t cross that fine line between creeping in and creeping out. Currently, consumers are unhappy with behavioral targeting practices, and now legislatures are getting involved. The New York State Assembly has plans to impose legal restrictions on the ways in which personal data is collected and used.

In line with the proposed New York State bill, a recent consumer poll conducted by TRUSTe and TNS Global indicates consumer demand for more transparency and user control around behavioral targeting. The survey provides insight into how marketers can make behavioral targeting more welcoming from a consumer perspective. Finding the right balance between wowing customers with superior customization and simply freaking them out will preserve consumer trust and help prevent state and federal legislation from curtailing your marketing plans for 2008.
Much of the evidence collected in the TRUSTe and TNS survey points to a consumer demand for more customized online ads and for an end to irrelevant, untargeted ads most commonly observed today.
• 87 percent reveal that fewer than 25 percent of the ads they see today are of any relevance.
• 72 percent of consumers find online advertising to be intrusive and annoying when ads are irrelevant to their interests.
• 64 percent say they would prefer to see only ads from online stores and brands they know and trust.
• 55 percent would be willing to fill out an anonymous survey about products, services, and brands they purchase in order to limit the online ads they see to those indicated in the survey.

But, according to survey results, two main obstacles threaten the promise of behavioral targeting: 1) the lack of consumer education and understanding, and 2) the lack of transparency and affirmative choice. Consumers indicate a high level of apprehension when it comes to tracking their browsing history and express little familiarity with the term “behavioral targeting.”
• 57 percent of survey respondents say they are uncomfortable with advertisers using their browsing history to provide relevant ads
• Only 40 percent of respondents are familiar with the term “behavioral targeting.”

While advertising based on anonymous information should be embraced by privacy sensitive individuals, there is still significant unease with behavioral techniques. This is not surprising when consumers are familiar with privacy mishaps such as the AOL search data disclosure, which allowed researchers to piece together several pieces of anonymous information to positively identify an individual. Seventy one percent of consumers said they were uncomfortable with third parties tracking their behavior for purposes of serving ads even when it couldn’t be tied with any PII.

Behavioral Advertising Dos and Don’ts

DO
- Matter-of-factly incorporate some disclosure of tracking and targeting as part of your product or service value proposition. Provide a “what is this” button to explain how your customization works.
- Make sure your service providers, agencies, and others are following industry standards for privacy notice and disclosure. The majority of serious complaints TRUSTe encounters are privacy breaches by marketing vendors.

DON’T
- Think you can get away with not giving your customers notice and choice. See Cathryn Harris v. Blockbuster.
- Undermine your investment in building your brand for a few response points. (more…)

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

During my senior year of college, I was part of an intensive journalism program where I had to show up Monday-Friday from 9-5 to further develop my skills before entering the scary real world. It was almost like a forced internship, if you will. My concentration within the school of journalism was print, rather than broadcast, multimedia, advertising or public relations.

It was a rather sunny day in South Carolina, as I raced across campus for the first day of my new program. Hung-over, disheveled, and now awkwardly sweaty, I made it through the classroom door with just a few seconds to spare.

“I don’t know why you’re even here,” professor Fisher said to the class. “You’ve spent four years learning about a dying industry.” Wow. Not what you want to hear while calculating your looming student loans in your head. I thought I was just going to receive the syllabus and call it a day! He went on to explain dwindling advertising revenues and circulation rates for newspapers as the reason for his dark humor.

Things have changed even more dramatically since that spring day a few years ago. Newspapers have continued to fade, and TV has begun to fade as well, as the Internet continues to gain steam as our society’s main platform for entertainment and news. The ad spend budget for the Internet is now poised to surpass TV in the UK. As with popular music trends, it’s only a matter of time before that’s the scenario in the U.S., as well.

That same South Carolina professor once read a quote from Molly Ivans that I still have trouble shaking. “I don’t so much mind newspapers dying—it’s watching them commit suicide that pisses me off.” As a magazine focused on educating multichannel marketers, we urge those in traditional media spaces not to be the next medium to meet their demise. With the research, webinars, seminars and conferences that ERA and Electronic Retailer put on throughout the year, you can be sure to remain relevant and viable in this ever-changing media landscape.

If you think a world without newspapers seems likely down the road, check out this hilarious clip from South Park that highlights a world without Internet, and what effect it has on our behavior and media consumption.

Pat Cauley is Electronic Retailer Magazine’s eMedia Editor

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

Pick up the newspaper: Our country and the world are in a state of anxiety about the economy, especially in light of a potential recession. What does that mean to us as marketers? Just how does the recession affect direct response advertising? Recessions are different from other economic downturns and need to be approached differently, but there are ways to weather the storm.

History teaches us that recessions reward the aggressive advertiser and penalize the timid one. Indeed, firms that maintained or increased their advertising expenditures during the 1981-1982 recession averaged significantly higher sales growth, both during the recession and for the following three years, than those that eliminated or decreased advertising.

By 1985, sales of companies that were aggressive recession advertisers had risen 256 percent over those that didn’t keep up their advertising. Why? One reason is that a recessionary market can provide an opportunity for businesses to build a greater share of market through aggressive advertising. Sometimes, we need to remind ourselves about the short-term benefits of advertising: It creates sales immediately; it generates added business from current customers; and it brings in new leads and prospects. In short, as one marketer pointed out, “When times are good, you should advertise. When times are bad, you must advertise.”

One trait of a true recession lies with shifts in consumer patterns. We can no longer expect even our core base of customers to behave in ways familiar to us and comfortable to them. Preparing for changes in consumer behavior will allow us to jumpstart new messaging, platforms and technologies—when this makes strategic sense—to capture the attention of both loyal and new customers. One false assumption is that it’s safe to reduce the advertising budget if the competition is reducing theirs. Research shows that companies maintaining or increasing advertising during periods of economic slow-down will boost market share. (more…)

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

If you’re an events manager with a death wish, invite Jason Calacanis to deliver the keynote address at your next conference. Sure, Calacanis—a serial Internet entrepreneur who made the bulk of his fortune with the sale of his company Weblogs, Inc. to AOL—will deliver an engaging, thought-provoking and sometimes flat-out inspirational talk. But then again, he might just start a riot.

After all, this is the guy who, at SES Chicago in 2006, announced—to a group of search professionals—that “SEO is bullshit!” and compared those engaging in SEO to “snake oil salesmen.”

It didn’t go over well.

Having escaped Chicago, living to speak another day, Calacanis recently addressed a room full of affiliate marketers at the Affiliate Summit West. Apparently unruffled by the flap and furor over his SEO comments, Calacanis explained to the affiliate folks that the rest of the industry saw them as the bottom rung of the food chain, wired to make the quick buck.

There was no standing ovation.

But to be fair to Calacanis, he’s not some sort of egomaniacal misanthrope who gets a perverse pleasure out of standing on a stage and belittling the audience. (Actually, he might just take a little pleasure in it.) In fact, the point he’s trying to make is a valid and intriguing one.

First of all, Calacanis was over-generalizing for effect: he sees value in ethical SEO and understands that there are legitimate best practices to follow in designing, maintaining and promoting a site that will allow it to rank higher in search results. And he certainly doesn’t see anything wrong with the fundamental concept of affiliate marketing: engaging a group of websites to help sell product or generate leads as a sort-of extended sales force.

Calacanis has a problem with those interested in gaming the system to make a quick buck—whether it’s the black-hat SEO firm that exploits a weakness in a search engine algorithm to garner a temporary high rank for an undeserving website (until the search engine closes the loophole and the site plummets off the search results page) or the affiliate who steals content to game the search engines to generate more traffic and commissions, or the marketer who floods blogs, message boards and social networks with paid posts.

According to Calacanis, it’s all borne out of a misguided ethic that has pervaded the Internet since the mid-’90s: if one is technically capable of doing something, then it’s OK.

But he—and others—see reason for optimism. As more and more black-hat marketers exploit the various systems, these systems eventually break down, to be replaced by ones that are more resistant to gaming. Consumers are helping to drive change, too. We leave MySpace to go to Facebook and then to LinkedIn as policing technologies are developed that help eliminate spam or fraud. Sites like Angie’s List—a ratings and reviews site for home-improvement contractors—take off because they are curated to ensure the reviews’ (and reviewers’) legitimacy. In other words, because they earn our trust. Calacanis himself has developed Mahalo.com, a search engine that uses human beings to find and organize the best links for given search terms—and to filter out irrelevant or spam results.

A new ethic is evolving: trustworthiness is good for business.

Tom Dellner is executive editor of Electronic Retailer Magazine and editor of its supplement, Online Strategies

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

After Omniture’s acquisition surge last year, the web analytics industry has just been made even smaller by Yahoo’s acquisition of IndexTools. What does it mean when a relatively high-end tool like IndexTools is turned into a free offering like Google had done for Urchin?

Mostly, it means that Yahoo will be able to compete head-on with Google and Microsoft as they offer measured proof that advertising on their properties is a good investment. But how does this shrinking vendor landscape play against growing customer demand?

In these rocky economic times, upper management wants to know that a dollar spent online will result in two dollars earned. The online budget is not getting cut, but it is getting scrutinized like never before. They are looking for all the tools and best practices they can lay their hands on.

As free tools get better, the pay-for-play tools do as well. I look to Omniture, Coremetrics and WebTrends to step up to the challenge and help their high-end clients with even more systems, methods and consulting services. They are incorporating multi-campaign attribution in their tools so more of their clients are learning the ropes. Soon, there will be case studies and best practices.

Until then, I turn to people like Jim Novo and his post on Marketing Attribution Models. I look to Eric Peterson and Avinash Kaushik to keep holding up the lamp so the rest of us can see. I look to the Web Analytics Association to be the collective wisdom of the industry and for the eMetrics Marketing Optimization Summit to be the gathering place, where we can all learn from each other.

Will Google, Microsoft and Yahoo want to play at the enterprise end of the spectrum? Things move fast in this industry. Don’t blink!

Jim Sterne is president of Target Marketing and Chairman of the Web Analytics Association

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

I recently heard a statistic that 76 percent of consumers don’t trust advertising. Ouch, that’s gotta hurt. This means that your industry’s credibility is only slightly more viable than Hillary’s sinking odds at snagging the Democratic nomination.

Just when you think the direct response industry, or the advertising industry at large, have finally gained some street cred, we get sacked with more FTC complaints against Kevin Trudeau or revelations that Lipitor ads featuring Dr. Robert Jarvik are misleading.

There’s a reason why “Saturday Night Live” has consistently come up with relevant material to ridicule the ad industry…we practically spoon-feed it to them.

All jokes aside, enough is enough! Join ERA and Electronic Retailer at our upcoming events, where you have the power to learn about and change the course of your industry.

April 30, NYC – ERA Legal Series: Practical Knowledge for the New Technology Landscape

The seminar will shed light on the most recent FTC developments and offer practical insights and in-depth legal solutions in the area of emerging technologies, notably behavioral advertising.

April 31, NYC – Electronic Retailer LiveEdit Lab

Discover the fate of paid programming at our Executive Media Summit, followed by a day of relevant sessions geared to keep your business ahead of the game and afloat in times of economic uncertainty.

May 20, Washington, D.C. – ERA Government Affairs Fly-In

Finally, if you truly want to be involved and have your voice heard on behalf of the industry, join with your colleagues as we teach you the legislative issues facing your business. You’ll then be paired into groups with a seasoned lobbyist to meet with your elected representatives in Congress on Capitol Hill to voice your concerns.

It’s your industry; perhaps it’s time to take some ownership.

Pat Cauley, eMedia Editor, Electronic Retailer Magazine

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

According to ERA’s most recently commissioned paper, Mapping the Path to Purchase, Forrester Research suggests that television drives online sales. Indeed, 44 percent of the study’s respondents went to retail to find a product they saw on an infomercial or home shopping channel and more than one-third of consumers visit engines (eBay, Yahoo, Google, etc.) to compare prices, with more than 50 percent of those making a purchase.

But wait, there’s more; now it’s the consumers themselves who are creating pathways and signposts. It’s interesting, looking at the apparent quick rise of the “consumer influencer.” It seems just yesterday when branding was king and PR, marketing, research and agencies pushed sales. But today, through the power of blogs, online communities, forums, boards, videos on YouTube, Facebook and more, customers are definitely in charge.

I wonder what retailers think about how this will all shake out? How do retailers leverage those consumer influencers?

Sieglinde Friedman is ERA’s vice president of strategy

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

That is to say, after a 50 plus-year reign of supremacy, has broadcast media begun to slide down a slippery slope to be consigned to history with the telegraph and Morse code? More and more evidence seems to be mounting that broadcast is facing troubled times. First, the market was segmented when cable came of age. The “Big three” were suddenly faced with actual competition and they lost significant numbers of eyeballs. This didn’t do a lot for programming initially, the song “500 Channels and Nothing on” sort of summed up the early cable landscape (with the possible exception of MTV, in the early days). But eventually, the industry found its footing and went the way of the magazine industry with channels dedicated to niche markets—think the History Channel for old men, the Food Network for people who like to eat, the Travel Channel for people who want to see the world without leaving their house, and Animal Planet for people who can sit through six hours of Ron Reagan commentating the riveting action of a dog show.

And while radio has always been a bit of a wild-west environment, the world reacted to the homogenization of content with satellite radio and our friends (soon to be friend) XM and Sirius (maybe Xirius, quick run out and register that URL). Once again we have channels that are designed to appeal to a much narrower demographic based on the inescapable logic that there may not be enough of an audience to make a radio station devoted entirely to the delta blues genre in any one metropolitan area, but if you take all of the people from all of the metropolitan areas in the country and add in the smattering of people in between those places, suddenly you have a potential audience that rivals the legions of Britney Spears fans that used to exist. And Clear Channel had to go running to a judge to make sure its leveraged buyout isn’t plagued by nit picky questions from a lot of bean counting bankers.

So, we see the broadcast universe moving to a model of medium-casting, with content appealing on different channels to smaller groups of people. But where do we go from here? (more…)

Bookmark It